Product Liability

Philadelphia Defective Product Liability Lawyers

Defective products cause serious injuries and deaths to people who trust manufacturers to deliver safe goods. Groen Strokoff O’Neill Trial Lawyers have experience in handling a variety of product liability cases. GSO Lawyers have represented injured victims and families in defective product lawsuits throughout Pennsylvania, serving the Philadelphia and Conshohocken areas.

Preventable harm caused by dangerous products and defective devices should not go swept under the rug. Every case is approached with compassion and precision. GSO Lawyers holds negligent companies accountable. GSO Lawyers represents individuals and families seeking a product liability lawyer in Montgomery County, a defective product attorney in Delaware County, and a product defect trial lawyer in Bucks County, Chester County, and New Jersey, in addition to Philadelphia. We handle catastrophic injury litigation involving unsafe consumer products, medical devices, and industrial equipment.


The Three Types of Product Defects Explained

Design Defects: Items that are Dangerous from the Blueprint

A design defect means the product was inherently dangerous even before manufacturing began. The design itself makes the product unreasonably dangerous for its intended use. Every product made from that design shares the same flaw. Examples include SUVs designed with high centers of gravity that roll over too easily, medical devices designed without adequate safety features, or children’s products designed without considering foreseeable misuse by young children. Design defect cases often involve showing that a safer alternative design existed that would have prevented the injury without significantly impacting the product’s usefulness or cost.

Manufacturing Defects: When Production of Item Goes Wrong

Manufacturing defects occur when something goes wrong during the production process, making a specific product different from the intended design and dangerous. Unlike design defects that affect all products, manufacturing defects typically affect individual products or production batches. Examples include contaminated pharmaceuticals, improperly assembled machinery, weak welds in metal products, or foreign objects in food. These cases often involve comparing the defective product to properly manufactured versions to show the deviation from specifications.

Failure to Warn: Inadequate Warnings of Item’s Safety

Even properly designed and manufactured products can be defective if they lack adequate warnings or instructions about known dangers. Manufacturers have a duty to warn consumers about risks that aren’t obvious and to provide clear instructions for safe use. Inadequate warning cases involve products with hidden dangers, insufficient label warnings, warnings buried in fine print, technical language consumers don’t understand, or complete failure to warn about serious risks the manufacturer knew about. Prescription drug cases frequently involve failure to warn physicians and patients about serious side effects.


Product Liability Lawsuit May Seek Compensation for a Variety of Injuries

Every case is unique in their circumstances. Using medical experts, engineers, and industry professionals, GSO Lawyers in the Philadelphia and Conshohocken areas have gotten their clients compensation for injuries such as:

  • Medical expenses related to the injury caused by the defective product
  • Future medical care and rehabilitation costs
  • Lost wages and diminished earning capacity
  • Pain and suffering from catastrophic injuries
  • Emotional distress and mental anguish
  • Loss of quality of life and permanent disability
  • Disfigurement and scarring
  • Property damage caused by the defective product
  • Wrongful death damages including funeral costs and loss of companionship
  • Punitive damages when manufacturer conduct is egregious

Successfully proving liability requires a clear demonstration that the product was defective and that the defect directly caused the injury. We represent clients suffering catastrophic injuries caused by dangerous or defective products, including traumatic brain injuries, spinal cord injuries, burns, amputations, and wrongful death. Clients seeking a product liability trial lawyer in Montgomery County and a defective product attorney in Delaware County rely on our trial-focused approach, as well as individuals and families in Bucks County, Chester County, and New Jersey.


Pennsylvania Mass Torts and Lawsuits

Pennsylvania Mass Tort Litigation

When a single product defect causes similar injuries to many people, cases may be consolidated into mass tort litigation. Unlike class actions where everyone shares one outcome, mass torts allow each plaintiff to receive compensation based on their individual injuries. Examples include defective medical devices like hernia mesh or hip implants, and defective products like airbags and seatbelts. Mass torts share discovery and expert resources while preserving individual case values. Our defective product law firm has experience with both individual cases and mass tort litigation, ensuring you receive personalized attention while benefiting from shared resources.

Multidistrict Litigation (MDL)

Federal courts may consolidate similar product liability cases from across the country into Multidistrict Litigation for pretrial proceedings. MDLs streamline discovery, avoid inconsistent rulings, and create efficiency. After bellwether trials test case values, most MDLs result in global settlements. Your Philadelphia product liability lawyer will explain whether your case may be part of an MDL and how that affects your timeline and recovery.


Types of Philadelphia Product Liability Cases We Handle

Defective Medical Devices

Product liability lawsuits involving defective hip implants, hernia mesh, pacemakers, IVC filters, surgical instruments, insulin pumps, and other medical devices that fail, break, migrate, or cause serious complications requiring revision surgery and ongoing medical treatment.

Dangerous Pharmaceuticals and Drugs

Cases involving dangerous prescription medications with severe side effects, contaminated drugs, inadequate warnings about risks like stroke or heart attack, failure to disclose serious health complications to patients and physicians, and pharmaceutical manufacturing errors.

Defective Automobiles and Vehicle Components

Defective product claims arising from faulty airbags that explode or fail to deploy, tire blowouts, brake system failures, steering defects, seatbelt malfunctions, fuel system defects causing fires, ignition switch failures, and rollover-prone vehicle designs.

Consumer Product Defects

Lawsuits involving dangerous household products, exploding batteries, children’s toys with choking or lead hazards, defective appliances causing fires or electrocution, furniture tip-overs, space heaters causing fires, defective power tools, and electronics with burn or shock risks.

Industrial Equipment and Machinery

Product liability cases involving defective factory equipment, construction machinery lacking safety guards, power tools with defective switches, forklifts with stability issues, welding equipment failures, and industrial products causing workplace injuries through design flaws or manufacturing defects.

Defective Baby and Children’s Products

Claims involving dangerous cribs with entrapment hazards, defective car seats that fail in crashes, strollers with collapse or amputation risks, highchairs causing falls, toys with choking hazards or toxic materials, and baby products recalled after causing injuries or deaths.

Defective Sporting and Recreational Equipment

Product liability lawsuits involving defective helmets that fail to protect, bicycle defects, exercise equipment malfunctions, defective ladders, sporting equipment failures, and recreational products with hidden dangers.

Food Contamination and Poisoning

Cases involving contaminated food products causing serious illness, undeclared allergens, foreign objects in food, bacterial contamination like E. coli or Salmonella, and failure to warn about contamination risks.


Pennsylvania Product Liability FAQs

Pennsylvania law governs how the funds are distributed. When a financial recovery is obtained, either by settlement or trial verdict, the damages are typically paid directly to you after deducting attorney fees (usually 33-40%), case expenses advanced by your attorney for experts and testing, and any liens from medical providers or health insurance companies that paid for your treatment. In wrongful death cases involving defective products, damages are distributed to beneficiaries (spouse, children, or parents) according to state law. If your case is part of mass tort litigation, settlement administration may involve structured processes ensuring fair distribution. Your attorney will explain exactly how your settlement will be paid and distributed before you accept any offer.

Product recalls are powerful evidence that the manufacturer knew or should have known about the defect. Recalls often follow numerous injury reports and internal testing showing dangers, making them admissions of defect. However, many dangerous products are never recalled despite causing serious injuries. If a recall occurred before your injury but you weren’t aware of it, the manufacturer may be liable for failing to adequately notify consumers. Recall notices often fail to reach product owners, leaving dangerous products in homes. If the recall happened after your injury, it strongly supports your claim that the product was defective at the time of your injury.

Product liability claims can be based on strict liability, meaning you don’t need to prove the manufacturer was negligent or careless, only that the product was defective and caused your injury. This is significantly more favorable to injured consumers than traditional negligence claims, which require proving the defendant failed to exercise reasonable care. Under strict liability, even if the manufacturer used reasonable care in design and production, they’re still liable if the product was defective. However, product liability cases can also include negligence claims (like the manufacturer failed to use reasonable care) and breach of warranty claims (if the product didn’t meet promised standards). Your product liability attorneys will pursue all applicable legal theories to maximize your recovery.

Warning labels don’t automatically protect manufacturers from liability. The question is whether the warnings were adequate, meaning they clearly communicated the specific risks in a way that allowed consumers to make informed decisions. Warnings that are vague, hidden in fine print, use technical language consumers don’t understand, fail to convey the severity of risks, or are printed in tiny fonts may be inadequate. Additionally, if the product has a design defect that makes it unreasonably dangerous, a warning label alone may not be sufficient.

Yes. Product liability law protects all users and bystanders injured by defective products, not just the original purchaser. If you were injured while using someone else’s product, received the product as a gift, borrowed the product, or were simply nearby when a product malfunctioned and caused injury, you can still pursue a claim. Pennsylvania product liability law focuses on whether the product was defective and caused injury, not on the contractual relationship between you and the seller. Even innocent bystanders injured by defective products have valid claims against manufacturers.

Yes, preserving the actual product is critical evidence in your case. The product itself proves the defect existed and allows your experts to examine it, test it, and demonstrate how it failed. Do not throw it away or alter the defective product. Stop using it immediately to prevent further injury. Take photographs from multiple angles showing the defect, damage, warning labels, model numbers, and serial numbers. Photograph your injuries as they appear and heal. Keep all packaging, receipts, instruction manuals, and warranty information. If you no longer have the product, contact a defective product attorney immediately, as there may still be ways to prove your case through medical records, similar products, company testing data, and expert analysis.

Pennsylvania recognizes three types of product defects. Design defects exist when the product’s design is inherently dangerous, even if manufactured perfectly. Meaning every product made from that blueprint shares the same flaw. Manufacturing defects occur when something goes wrong during production, making the specific product different from others and unsafe. Failure to warn (marketing defects) involves inadequate instructions or warnings about known dangers associated with the product. You may have a valid claim under any of these theories if the defect caused your injury.

Posted on Google Google
John McKenna profile picture
John McKenna
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
GSO, and Max Goldberg in particular, handled a personal injury case for a family member. Thanks to his diligence and persistence, the settlement we received was beyond our original expectations! I highly recommend!
Posted on Google Google
Joy Lyons profile picture
Joy Lyons
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
We are truly grateful for the help we received from Justin Groen and his amazing team. From our first consultation, throughout our difficult journey and until finalized Justin showed our family care, compassion, professionalism and exhausted all resources to achieve the best possible outcome.
Posted on Google Google
Sandi McKenna profile picture
Sandi McKenna
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
When I reached out to Max Goldberg after my car was totaled by another driver and my elderly mom was severely injured, I was beside myself. He calmed my fears and handled every detail with professionalism and kindness. He was patient with my many questions, handling both of our case with compassion. I put my trust in Max and he did not let me down!
Posted on Google Google
Nick Tarbotton profile picture
Nick Tarbotton
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Max Goldberg was extremely helpful and provided excellent representation. I was updated throughout the process and Max always answered my questions in a timely fashion. I would recommend GSO.
Posted on Google Google
Karla Fletcher profile picture
Karla Fletcher
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Need a lawyer who cares about you and not just your case. Ask for Fran O'neil hands down a kind gental soul who cares about you as a whole person not just another case. He made me case so easy without me having to worry about anything but healing and getting better Never met a lawyer who wasn't afraid of doing the heavy lifting such as he did for me . Would recommend to everyone
Posted on Google Google
Anne Ganthier profile picture
Anne Ganthier
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
The most amazing lawyers so generous I’m so lucky to come across them. I’m so thankful for them .
Posted on Google Google
Robert Kelly profile picture
Robert Kelly
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I honestly didnt know what to expect when I had to seek legal council. I was fortunate enough to have Bill Coppol as my lawyer. From day one Bill was thoughtful, transparent and caring. I never felt for one moment that he did not have my best interests at heart. I highly recommend assure you that you will be in good hands. Also shout out to an unsung hero. Mike is a paralegal here and he was with me for select appointments and was always on top of communication and information gathering.
Posted on Google Google
Dante Thompson profile picture
Dante Thompson
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Great job by Mr. Franklin, thank you.
Posted on Google Google
Cindy Pruitt profile picture
Cindy Pruitt
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I am so grateful to have had Max Goldberg as my lawyer what incredible work they do at this farm thank you for all your hard work🫶🏽
Posted on Google Google
Brianna Reyes profile picture
Brianna Reyes
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
We are incredibly grateful for the outstanding work Justin Groen did on my families behalf. From the very beginning, he was professional, compassionate, and truly committed to our case. He took the time to explain every step of the process in a way that was easy to understand, which gave us a lot of confidence during a very stressful time. His attention to detail, strong knowledge of the law, and dedication to achieving the best possible outcome really stood out. We always felt like our concerns were heard and that our case genuinely mattered to him. Communication was consistent and clear, and he was always responsive whenever we had questions. Thank you Justin and the entire GSO team for all of their hard work and expertise, our case was handled successfully, and we couldn’t be more satisfied with the outcome. We highly recommend Justin to anyone in need of a skilled and trustworthy attorney. He is the absolute best in the business!!!